An occasion for change
Two
months ago it was generally accepted that shares on the stock market
were overpriced. This was explained by the very low or negative
interest rates that were the consequence of central bank
interventions on the short term (repo) and long term (QE) lending
markets. As dividends and interest are alternative forms of profit,
they always keep more or less in step with one another. And even the
smallest of dividends is better than negative interest.
The
pandemic is savaging supply and demand, and countless businesses are
on the verge of destruction. The market’s first reaction was to
sell. The rush for cash resulted in most share indexes losing a third
of their value, and interest went up a few decimal points. But
holding cash does not generate revenue so, as soon as governments and
central banks promised hand-outs of hundreds and thousands of
billions, buying started up again. At present the Standard & Poor
index is only about 17% below its peak and interest rates have sunk
lower than ever.
Market
gamblers are betting that industry, commerce and finance will weather
the storm and regain their previous splendour. They seem to have
forgotten that the past glory was built on sand, and was already
showing severe signs of strain. The return of market exuberance seems
premature, as nobody knows when or how the pandemic will end. All
this commotion cannot fade away without a trace. Tomorrow will not be
like yesterday. It could be better and it could be worse. In the
second case, it might be just as well that Boomers are no longer
around to see the mess they made and cry over spilt milk. But the
first case would mean that same generation - who owns most of the
world’s wealth and decides how it is governed - has radicalised
suddenly and remembered its rebellious and carefree youth, or has
mostly died off with respiratory symptoms.
The
idea that the epidemic will go away just as it came: quickly and
quietly, is presumptuous and most certainly wrong. The repercussions
will be long lasting, measured in years not months. A different way
of life will emerge, more centred on essentials and more localised.
Travel and tourism will be the worst hit, in what could be a
permanent trend. Sea cruises and sight-seeing plane flights may never
start up again, and the makers of cruise ships and passenger planes
will have no more customers. In which case, providing them with
financial assistance is pure waste, especially Boeing with its
parking lots already full of 737-MAXs. The countries that host
tourism, and all do to some extent, will lose a more or less
important inflow of foreign currency, with a direct impact on their
national finances. The fall in travel miles equals a drop in fuel
consumption, which means excess production and shrinking prices. And
cutting off that surplus will be an unprecedented and massive
reversal of the growth trend and its ideological monopoly. There is
talk of a reduction in global demand of 25 million barrels per day,
more than twice US production and over a quarter of world
consumption. Agriculture is also in trouble. Especially industrial
farming that employs large numbers of seasonal labour, lodged and fed
in often sordid conditions with no social distancing, and many have
been stopped by closed borders. A lot of these industries sell their
crops and meat to fast-food and restaurant chains that have largely
closed down. Small farms that employ family and neighbours, and sell
their produce locally may fare better than the mega ones. The fashion
industry is crashing and the production of cars and trucks is on
standby, but so far the military-industrial sector does not seem to
be complaining.
Exceptional
life-changing events are occurring in every domain. The fundamental
processes of expansion and growth have gone into reverse. Everything
is shrinking, production, consumption and space itself has dwindled
to domestic proportions. As this is likely to last a year or more,
until widespread vaccination has occurred, it could be a time for
thought. Humanity has been hurtling towards financial, environmental
and climatic chaos, so the global lockdown could be an opportunity.
Having almost come to a standstill, a complete change of direction
becomes possible. For the time being all talk is about getting back
to “normal”, the normality of poisoning the atmosphere, soils,
rivers and oceans, of desperate poverty and of wanton mayhem with
high-explosives. The desirability of such a norm is questionable, and
what better time to question it than now, as it is forced into
slow-motion. 2020 could be the year 01 of a cooperative, durable
future, or of heightened violence and destruction. The outcome will
depend on how many people are convinced that a different world is
possible. And the disruption of the coming months will decide the
balance.