Friday, January 25, 2019

Riding the debtworm


Why is the world periodically subjected to economic slumps, depressions, and recessions? This has nothing to do with meteorological disasters, as was the case in the past when just about everyone’s livelihood depended on agriculture, it is something systematic, inherent to the way finance and production function. Money is lent and credit is granted at interest, so that more comes back than has been handed out. Goods and services are produced and sold with a profit, so that more comes back than has been paid out. More value comes out of the market than is put in, and that constant flow of extra value must come from somewhere.

Only central banks are allowed to print banknotes and mint coins, and they thereby control the amounts in circulation. But all banks can create scriptural money out of thin air, by simply crediting their clients’ accounts. This is what allows the market to give more than it gets. However, material notes and coins are marginal forms of payment, so it is the virtual value of credit that funds that extra wealth. (Credit is virtual value because the transaction occurs but the actual payment takes place at a future date or by instalments.)

Credit is granted and allows the realisation of profits and interest. But every additional credit granted increases the amount of interest that is due. Credit is needed to pay both profits and interest, but it only increases interest, which becomes increasingly preponderant. Moreover, past credits must be constantly renewed to avoid a fall in general demand. Credit must multiply to accompany the growing profits of an expanding supply and to sustain its own growing interest, and it must be regularly renewed, so it just piles up ever higher.

Credit covers a wide variety of forms and conditions. One of these conditions is its duration, which can last hours, days, weeks, months, or years up to a century. These different time scales mean that some debts need to be renewed frequently, while others run for decades. Also, borrowing tends to be cyclical with peaks and troughs, and when several peaks occur more or less simultaneously, the down turn is sudden, whereas troughs usually last some time so their assembled up turn is gradual.

Profit and interest need the extra inflows of credit to realise their value. But credit is cyclical. It expands and contracts, and often errs into the subprime region where it falls off a cliff. And, even without a cliff-edge effect, contracting credit means the toll of profit and interest is taken on demand, which in turn contracts. To be able to operate, profit capitalism and usury need credit, but it grows and withers, and occasionally collapses. These causes and events are the mechanisms of the world’s economic upheavals. But, without profits, how would production expand with more of the same and with novelties? It seems possible that productive investments, as opposed to speculative ones, could be financed by credit granted by local, national and international mutual funds. The invested credits that fail (some will) would be written off, and those that succeed would become part of the monetary mass in circulation. The unsuccessful borrower – there could be several in association - would find it difficult to borrow again, and the successful one would keep his credit as part of his stock. Another way of doing things is possible. There is no fatality in human acts. They are driven by ideology and emotions. But ideologies can be shown to be false and misleading, and that modifies the emotional aspect.

Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Centenary


A hundred years ago today, Rosa Luxemburg was brutally murdered in Berlin, beaten with gun butts before being shot in the head and having her body thrown into the Landwerh Canal. The killers were soldiers made callous by trench warfare. They belonged to the Freikorps who were subduing the Berlin Spartacist uprising by cannon-shot, machinegun fire and mass executions, under the orders of Noske, Sheidemann and Ebert. That night – she was arrested at about 9pm along with Karl Liebknecht who was murdered separately – the most brilliant socially-oriented mind of the times was obliterated, and a majority of her manuscripts were later destroyed. Fortunately for posterity “The Accumulation of Capital” and other published writings survived. And anyone wishing to better understand the fundamental link between profit capitalism and empire would be advised to read sections I & III of Rosa Luxemburg’s masterpiece (written in just four months of great exhilaration, according to a May 12 1917 letter to Diefenbach from the prison in Wronki where she had been incarcerated for opposing the war).
Accessible at Marxists Internet Archives:
Historical details from Paul Frölich’s “Rosa Luxemburg”, ed. Maspero, 1965

Saturday, January 12, 2019

Retail in tears


Retailers have measured a drop in sales compared to last year. The “festive” season, which represents up to a fifth of their annual business, has been disappointing, and though online shopping has grown it does not fill the gap. In France, this has been blamed on the Yellow Vests, but then they are being accused of all France’s woes. In the UK, this fall in Xmas spending is associated with Brexit, as are most other ongoing disruptions. In the US, the trade skirmishes with China are mentioned, and the belated, as far as December is concerned, federal shutdown and layoff of 800,000 employees is put forward. However, there could be a common denominator to all this slack in consumption. It could be that the future does not look too rosy and, instead of lavishly spending tomorrow’s incomes, people are wondering if these incomes will actually materialise. It could also mean that borrowing has peaked, as all growth must at some point. And that is bad news for capital, because debt fuels most of its profits. Pity the poor retailer who is the first to feel the pain.

Sunday, January 06, 2019

Identical curves


Company shares traded in New York are followed by three main indexes, the Dow Jones, the NASDAQ and the Standard & Poor. Though some companies figure in all three indexes, these three are supposed to measure different aspects of the market. The Dow Jones represents the thirty companies with the largest capitalisations, the NASDAQ encompasses dotcoms and the S&P covers a wide range (500) of different enterprises. However, despite their differences, the last two sessions of trading produced almost identical curves for all three indexes. They do tend to be similar because they measure the same market, but they should not be facsimiles. This could be pure coincidence, or maybe computers took over during the New Year break and they all have the same programme. Or it might be the result of secretive manipulations by the White House Plunge Prevention Team (1). If these carbon-copied curves continue next week, coincidence will become farfetched and vacations will be over, which will leave the PPT as the principal suspect. An alternative explanation could be that 25 companies included in the Dow Jones index outweigh the other 475 that are part of the S&P 500, that 5 companies in the Dow Jones index outweigh the other 3000+ that make up the NASDAQ composite index, and that 30 companies determine all the ups and downs of all three indexes. This could be the case, as for example the S&P Thursday Jan. 03, in the last half-hour of trading 246.78M shares were sold and brought the index down by 6.46 points. This was followed by sales of 129.43M shares that pushed the index up by 45.7 points. A similar thing happened Monday Jan. 07, when 331.26M shares took 8.32 points off the index, whereas the subsequent 155.13M shares sold added 30.85M points. In the first case the effect of a bit more than half as many shares was seven times greater. And in the second case a bit less than half had 3.7 times as much effect. (2)

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_Group_on_Financial_Markets
Click on 5D