Great again…?
The
26th of April 1937, at the height of the Spanish Civil
War, German planes bombed the Basque town of Guernica y Luno. Some
two thousand people died. This wanton killing of civilians provoked a
general outcry and a famous painting, but no concrete actions. The
6th and 9th of August 1945, in the last throes
of war against Japan, American planes bombed the cities of Hiroshima
and Nagasaki. Some one hundred thousand people died. This
premeditated mass murder of civilians brought some condemnations, no
celebrated artwork (1), substantial applause and widespread
justifications. Between these two events aerial bombing of urban
targets had become the norm. Nuclear fission had just multiplied a
bomber’s pay-load by over a thousand, and any way Americans had won
the war, vae victis. However, apart from America’s
diminutive allies, the Soviet Union also claimed victory. And there
were already tensions in Europe, along the dividing line between
occupying armies. So, with Soviet forces gathering just off the
Japanese coast on the Sakhalin peninsular, a similar situation was
avoided by Japan’s unconditional surrender. Little Boy and Fat Man
were a demonstration of unprecedented destructive power, a message to
Moscow.
1946
did not bring peace for everyone, there was still fighting in Greece
and China, and various anti-colonial insurgent movements were being
repressed, but it was the dawn of a New World Order. Two of the
world’s major industrial regions, Western Europe and East Asia, had
been largely reduced to rubble, while the third, North America, was
unscathed. Being the only nuclear power and producing half the
world’s wealth, the USA was able to impose its economic model by
aiding reconstruction, its cultural model with movies and records,
and its ideological model through radio channels and CIA subversions.
But America was not alone on the planet. Soviet Russia and, after
1949, the People’s Republic of China were powerfully armed and
presented an alternative vision. This line between two worlds became
a source of conflict and war. Millions would be killed and millions
more would suffer on both sides because of that fatal divide.
The
Cold War was a mutual destruction arms race fought with words, with
threats and bluff, slander and lies, and with frequent ultra-violence
more often than not by proxy agents. Except that one side was
supporting nationalists who were trying to break the yoke of colonial
dominion, while the other was placing puppet dictators who acted in
their patron’s interests. The Soviet Union held the moral upper
ground (China had gone its own way after Stalin’s death in 1953,
with its own personality cult around Mao Zedong), and this position
helped offset the huge economic unbalance it had with the US and its
vassals. Anti-colonialism, followed by anti-imperialism, was a
powerful propaganda tool, until it was turned around by the Soviet
invasion of Afghanistan. Afghanistan was one of the few countries
that had not been colonised by Europeans. The British had tried
unsuccessfully and finally left it alone as a buffer state between
their empire in India and the Russian empire. However, the Cold War
between the USA and the USSR allowed no neutrals. So, after several
regime changes, in 1979 when events in Iran were the centre of
attention, the Soviet army crossed the border and arrived in Kabul
for Christmas. This intervention would be as costly for Russia as had
been the intervention in Vietnam for America. But the US survived,
whereas the USSR did not. When it withdrew its troops in 1989, it was
so weakened that it collapsed two years later.
America
was all-powerful twice during the 20th century, the first
time on the ruins of Germany and Japan, the second time after the
ruin of Soviet Russia. In both cases, America presented not only a
military superiority but also a moral one, however dubious. The
fallen foes had it coming to them, and America was the instrument of
justice. But the myths of the beacon of enlightenment and of the
knight in white armour did not hold for the Vietnamese quagmire, nor
do they today for the endless fighting in Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen,
etc. These were and are acts of sheer power against puny adversaries
made to look as mean and dangerous as possible, and who refuse to
abandon their cause, which is a tribal, ethnic, religious,
traditional community and its volition to survive (2). America shines
when it takes on the strong, not when it brutalises the weak. In
today’s world the only heavy-weight contender is China allied with
Russia. Does Donald Trump intend to make America great again by
ruining the only other bullies around? And how will he make them seem
more contemptible than he is?
1.
There has of course been a lot of art on these two atrocities, among
them Alain Resnais’ 1959 film “Hiroshima mon amour”, but none
have been publicised like Picasso’s painting.
2.
A surprising number of people would rather die than give up their way
of life. Many of them have already disappeared and others are being
pushed to extinction. Some go down fighting and some commit suicide.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home